Originally posted by Keomo
Thats a good joke, but uh Religion=/=Philosophy, those are two completely different things that i think you misunderstand.
I don't remember ever bringing up religion, actually. The only mention of religion up until now was how Mr. Kane was taking a religious studies class.
Originally posted by Keomo
A lot of philosophy is required to solve many important world problems,
Really? Name one.
Originally posted by Keomo
solutions can be created through simply thinking about them
Actually no, they can't. Any well-defined theory must be compared to experiment to evaluate its validity. If a theory disagrees with experiment then it's wrong. It doesn't matter how smart the person is who came up with it, or what his name is, etc. If it disagrees with experiment then it's wrong. An unprecise theory, for example "A more or less does B, which can sorta kinda do C," is ill-defined, and as such is unfalsifiable. It can't be proven wrong because it has no predictive power whatever.
Originally posted by Keomo
but a simple basis for any Philosopher would be to not waste his/her time with fruitless things like religion, because yes your going to be there all day thinking "Hey is my god real/not real, or is his god real/not real?"
Right. I completely agree.
Originally posted by Keomo
Instead of arguing about that, try having a discussion about how to minimize criminal activity in your area, thats a more hands on subject to use.
That's called sociology, which employs the scientific method. If a well-defined theory in sociology makes predictions that agree with experiment, then it's obviously a good idea to use said theory. Pure Philosophy, by definition, is the attempt to understand nature by pure thought alone. Failure to compare philosophical ideas to experiment leads to the nonsense like "heavier objects fall faster than lighter objects" which nobody bothered to question for a few hundred years after Aristotle said it.
You might argue that "we're dealing with terms that can't be so precisely defined." Right! But then you can't claim to know anything about it.
Originally posted by Keomo
So yes Philosophy has very good uses that have very good intentions when used correctly. Or even incorrectly.
Good intentions I don't doubt. But its ability to produce useful knowledge is null.