Thanks for the fast ban.
View rIoexC.png on ScreenSnapr
Well, I will continue to do so because the issues have not affected you in any way.
So, without further tangents, you said "put your right" -- Yeah, I am right.
How are you going to stop me? Give me an infraction? On what grounds would you have to give an infraction to me? I haven't harmed anyone and I wasn't promoting/advertising any website, I simply expressed what there is to be done here and there. It's not like a mass spam.
So stop talking. You know you're wrong. If you think you're right, do something. I'll be here to dispute all your bullshit.
unban me noob
Proof I owe you 250k.
And sweet profile song.
You just contradicted yourself!
"Straight link and nothing else" ... "First time and so we give them a warning"
Please, just stop picking on me. I'm not doing anything wrong by talking. No links were/are being posted, no harm is being done, no advertising is being done. Just move on.
Side note: Visitor Messages are more private than threads / shoutbox.
You know what the most used sentence in "message to user" is in the infractions? No?
"You should read the rules over again."
Also, no you won't with RD. The advertisement has been in the guy's sig for awhile. It even says "Click here" on the GFX he made. I can find around 10-25 members advertising, but hasn't been handled. You can go look for them, but I'm not going to snitch. You're just taking it up with me because you have nothing better to do really. I know its not trolling because you're staff, but you're very agitating.
I know you've seen ***public*** signature advertisements. You just don't do anything because it wasn't harming anyone. Hell... I know people who advertised in sigs.
Rath and I have been advertising the LBG v3 for like 2 weeks straight without infraction. Just stop picking on me.
Quit trying. I'm not doing anything wrong. You're not even reading the very detailed messages I'm sending to you... You should, but are being insanely arrogant.
Discussion isn't a form of advertising if I'm not sending links. IF people want to know the website link, they will ask us for it for us to either join or view (Read section "-Advertising")
You are able to link to a website if it is not mass advertising (shown from infractions, but not put in the rules) and its not input in the rules that we cannot discuss about a site. It only says we cannot link to sites in public with the exception of "Google or YouTube" ... Go look in someone else's signature. There are more people breaking rules than I am on the VMs. "Reversed Designs" in one of the members in +tA is the most recent I seen. You're not going to do shit because I'm not premium. He is, so you won't give a ****.
Then why join? You called our site a rip of NGU when you forget, all they did is make the theme "Blue Amaze 3.x.x" famous. This is a community. Talk as we please unless it breaks the rules. Is website discussion without links DNP in the rules? I should go look over the section of "Advertising" -- Suggest you, a Moderator should too.
Discussion isn't DNP.
Reviewing it now for the 4th time since I've been here.
Alright. You do that. Now when no information being released on the site's whereabouts is, and you still delete it... Then I'll know whats up then. When there is important information in it like "Site is moving" or "Installed xxxx" or something that Rath can immediately share with me... Then we can take this up with a higher rank than you. I'm not fighting, I'm wondering why you are hating when you joined the site in the first place while trying to hide it (as shown by the VM conversation: You & RathHavoc).
No harm intended, so no harm was done.
I said hi. Whore. Gimme my 50k for my GFX or I will be forced to open a dispute.
Send an Instant Message to iDelete Using...
W@W Prem = Dead
Having fun, With Science.
ii Love My Life <3
Copyright © 2008-2015, NextGenUpdate. All Rights Reserved.