(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Okay, its not that interesting but i got to get you guys to realize you need to do some reading up and not just say "YAY! IW making another COD! !!!". Well here is news for you! The people who were in IW that even made COD4 and MW2 are not there anymore, they fleed off to join EA, the reason has to do with Activations.

Now for the 2nd part, Do not compare COD to BF at all, BF is a completely different type of FPS then COD is, both are very unique, all in their own ways, if your going to a vs between the two, atlest do one for who sold the most in the first week or first day, some of you should know that MW2 made over 104 Millions Dollars in the first 24 hours of launch. Just showing you the fact.

Also i am not one of those people who wine and cry cause i cant play cod nor bf, in fact i can play both, but i have to adjust from one game to another when playing between the two, cause they are nothing alike.

This is why..

COD = Fast Pace / Small Maps - Medium Maps / Currently unrealistic skill requiration (Undestructable buildings = repeatable camping in a building that shouldn't even exist)

BF = Slow Pace - Medium Pace depending on the fight and gametype / Large Maps - Extremely Large Maps / Currently realistic skill requiration (Destructable buildings = no repeatable camping in a building that does not exist due to excessive fire power on camping spot, in other words, i shoot that wall you camping behind with a rocket and your dead along with the camp spot you were just camping at) / Plus lots of freedom unlike cod has currently.

As you see, the games are not alike in its base area, you shouldn't beable to compare them, i mean MoH i would understand.

And no, i have no beef between the 2 games, i can play both, and i understand both have different types of skill, i know some of you may think when i say skill, i dont know what im talkin about, actually there are many different forms of skill, both gays require skill, but truthfully BF hands down requires more, because COD has alot of repeatable gun battles, when BF its like you take one building down and that changes the game up just alttle more , on the strategy side, both are equal, you cant say one needs more strategy then the other, its based on the team, people who have mics and people who are actually calling out locations. Strategy is not limited, its limitless, it depends on who you play with and if they are willing to actually try and start talkin to their team mates or know what to do.


Source: Google

PS. Sorry for grammar im drunk at the moment.

BIG NOTE: THIS IS TOTALLY IN THE WRONG SECTION!, IF A MOD CAN MOVE IT THAT WOULD BE SO BALLIN! my bad, i should not operate machinery while drunk!

im getting UC3, **** cod/bf drama b.s just to make more money

Its deff just a way to make more sales

I'll be getting both.

Alot of people think that the CoD franchise has been going on longer than MoH, but really it hasn't.

I remember back when I was like 5 playing Medal of Honor on our old-school PC.

Yet it seems like CoD is trying to be the best by being unrealistic, but having a little bit of realistic stuff (i.e. graphics), in the game.

While BF makes it more of a realistic game for mature teens/adults, with medium-paced game-modes that need a little bit more tactical planning.

So I'm buying both just to spice up my game collection. :y:

Your errors are fun. LOL

Anyways, i'm done with the cod series, BF3 will get my money.

I used to like Medal of Honour much more when I was younger, as I've grown older I've gained a dislike for MoH.
I have to say this is a game that first started me playing FPS games (like Goldeneye on the N64) so I have to give the creators some credit Otherwise I wouldn't be how I am now, this game possibly helped shape my childhood.

Activision try and make there games as realistic as possible, but try and keep it pretty easy for the gamers.
For example, in Battlefield and many other FPS games, they make it so with a sniper, to get a headshot at long distance, you must aim it a little higher than the head. Whereas in CoD you just aim on the head. Many people of a younger generation (like me), will go mad if the bullet does not hit a headshot when we aim at the head, which is why I would say many of us prefer CoD.
But for the more mature players, and people who have taken Military Training and something similar, they will want the game to be much more realistic, for the bullet not only to take longer to hit the enemy, but to also fall down as well, so gravity doesn't just take effect for grenades and jumping.

Yeah, I grew up on MoH, which got me into FPS, but I never actually started playing FPS games since CoD4 came about.

As for being the 'best FPS ever', nobody takes into consideration that they add the story mode for a reason, that's how game critics rate the games overall. Yes, multi-player has a say in how popular the game is, but it doesn't have a say in if the game is actually good.

That's why I've bought all kinds of FPS games, to compare & see which ones I like the most.

whats uc3? jw. pm me it, so that way little kids dont know what it is.

---------- Post added at 03:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:19 AM ----------



i was so drunk last night, i had nothing to do since im a psn user oh the karma i have!

---------- Post added at 03:25 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:21 AM ----------



I had MoH on a console, i forgot the console, it hada been N64 or Gamecube. ive played the main 3 of the old days, CoD, BF and MoH and originally i loved MoH, and i never did play the story mode, ive only played against A.I bots, lol to be honest i never play story modes for games, unless its like masseffect or gta or on those lines.

---------- Post added at 03:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:25 AM ----------



im surprised they didnt even do a remake for BF 1943, that was my favorite BF up till BFBC2.

Lol, UC3 is Uncharted 3 and why do the "little kids" not need to know about it... Your grammar/spelling resembles a "little kids" one.