Yet that's still a pretty shitty way to handle it. If someone bought all that shit and had no plans on picking up the next game you were SOL. Granted you could argue there would be a limited player base but at that point there really wasn't a need for a new game. People seem to forget that you could have added any new features to a game through patches or paid dlc. Really no reason to continually pump out new games if the the only difference is a car roster and track list.

And that can all be handled in a patch. If it was a completely new engine then yea a new game would be warranted but that would make no sense to do that. You just said what I said could have just been an expansion or a patch. I've played both. Calling a car list and track differences a reason to release a new game makes no sense. You problem also advocate a new COD game every time they change 2 maps and add in 5 guns.

Really now. Maybe I should bold where you didn't agree. You clearly said you had to play both games to see the "DIFFERENCES" where I said there aren't any. You can't be this dense.

Battle field is the same thing. They have been using the same engine for years.